If you are hungry for even more, make sure to check my other article about 32993-05-8. Safety of Chlorocyclopentadienylbis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II)
A couple of challenges comes to mind: improving temperature dependence of relative stabilities of polymorphs would help in identifying enantiotropic relationships. 32993-05-8, Name is Chlorocyclopentadienylbis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II), molecular formula is C41H35ClP2Ru. In a Article,once mentioned of 32993-05-8, Safety of Chlorocyclopentadienylbis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II)
A new class of PNP pincer ligands, pyridine-2,6-diylbis(diphenylphosphino)methanone, 2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N) (1) (hereafter referred to as “bis(phosphomide)”), was prepared by the reaction of picolinoyldichloride with diphenylphosphine in the presence of triethylamine. The bis(phosphomide) 1 shows symmetrical PNP, unsymmetrical PNO and simple bidentate PP coordination modes when treated with various transition metal precursors. The reaction between 1 and [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 in a 1 : 1 molar ratio yielded a binuclear complex [Ru2Cl4(NCCH3)(p-cymene){2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}] (2) containing an unsymmetrical PNO pincer cage around one of the ruthenium centers, whereas the second ruthenium is bonded to the other phosphorus atom along with cymene and two chloride atoms. Symmetrical pincer complexes [RuCl(NCCH3)2{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}](ClO4) (3), [Ru(eta5-C5H5){2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}](OTf) (4) and [RhCl{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}] (5) were obtained in the respective reactions of 1 with [RuCl(NCCH3)2(p-cymene)](ClO4), [Ru(eta5-C5H5)Cl(PPh3)2] and [Rh(COD)Cl]2. Group 10 metal complexes [NiCl{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}](BF4) (6), [PdCl{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}]ClO4 (7) and [PtCl{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}]ClO4 (8) were obtained by transmetallation reactions of in situ generated AgI salts of 1 with Ni(DME)Cl2 or M(COD)Cl2 (M = Ni, Pd and Pt). The reactions between 1 and CuX or [Cu(NCCH3)4](BF4) produced mononuclear complexes of the type [CuX{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}] (9, X = Cl; 10, X = Br; 11, X = I), [Cu(NCCH3){Ph2C(O)}2(C5H3N)}](BF4) (12) and [Cu{Ph2C(O)}2(C5H3N)}2](BF4) (13). Similarly, the silver complexes [AgX{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}] (14, X = ClO4; 15, X = Br) were obtained by the treatment of 1 with AgClO4 or AgBr in 1 : 1 molar ratios. Treatment of 1 with AuCl(SMe2) in 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 molar ratios produced mono- and binuclear complexes, [AuCl{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}] (16) and [Au2Cl2{2,6-{Ph2PC(O)}2(C5H3N)}] (17), in good yield. The structures of ligand 1 and complexes 2, 5 and 17 were confirmed using single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies. DFT calculations were carried out to gain more insights into the structure and bonding features as well as feasibility of some key chemical transformations.
If you are hungry for even more, make sure to check my other article about 32993-05-8. Safety of Chlorocyclopentadienylbis(triphenylphosphine)ruthenium(II)
Reference:
Highly efficient and robust molecular ruthenium catalysts for water oxidation,
Catalysts | Special Issue : Ruthenium Catalysts – MDPI