New explortion of Dichloro(benzene)ruthenium(II) dimer

Note that a catalyst decreases the activation energy for both the forward and the reverse reactions and hence accelerates both the forward and the reverse reactions.Product Details of 37366-09-9, you can also check out more blogs about37366-09-9

The reaction rate of a catalyzed reaction is faster than the reaction rate of the uncatalyzed reaction at the same temperature.37366-09-9, Name is Dichloro(benzene)ruthenium(II) dimer, molecular formula is C12H12Cl4Ru2. In a Article,once mentioned of 37366-09-9, HPLC of Formula: C12H12Cl4Ru2

A series of half-sandwich Ru(II) arene complexes of the type [Ru(eta6-arene)(L)Cl](PF6) 1-4, where arene is benzene (1, 2) or p-cymene (3, 4) and L is N-methylhomopiperazine (L1) or 1-(anthracen-10-ylmethyl)-4-methylhomopiperazine (L2), has been isolated and characterized by using spectral methods. The X-ray crystal structures of 2, 3 and 4 reveal that the compounds possess a pseudo-octahedral “piano- stool” structure equipped with the arene ligand as the seat and the bidentate ligand and the chloride ion as the legs of the stool. The DNA binding affinity determined using absorption spectral titrations with CT DNA and competitive DNA binding studies varies as 4 > 2 > 3 > 1, depending upon both the arene and diazacycloalkane ligands. Complexes 2 and 4 with higher DNA binding affinities show strong hypochromism (56%) and a large red-shift (2, 10; 4, 11 nm), which reveals that the anthracenyl moiety of the ligand is stacked into the DNA base pairs and that the arene ligand hydrophobicity also dictates the DNA binding affinity. In contrast, the monocationic complexes 1 and 3 are involved in electrostatic binding in the minor groove of DNA. The enhancement in viscosities of CT DNA upon binding to 2 and 4 are higher than those for 1 and 3 supporting the DNA binding modes of interaction inferred. All the complexes cleave DNA effectively even in the absence of an external agent and the cleavage ability is enhanced in the presence of an activator like H2O 2. Tryptophan quenching measurements suggest that the protein binding affinity of the complexes varies as 4 > 2 > 3 > 1, which is the same as that for DNA binding and that the fluorescence quenching of BSA occurs through a static mechanism. The positive DeltaH0 and DeltaS 0 values for BSA binding of complexes indicate that the interaction between the complexes and BSA is mainly hydrophobic in nature and the energy transfer efficiency has been analysed according to the Foerster non-radiative energy transfer theory. The variation in the ability of complexes to cleave BSA in the presence of H2O2, namely, 4 > 2 > 3 > 1, as revealed from SDS-PAGE is consistent with their strong hydrophobic interaction with the protein. The IC50 values of 1-4 (IC50: 1, 28.1; 2, 23.1; 3, 26.2; 4, 16.8 muM at 24 h; IC 50: 1, 19.0; 2, 15.9; 3, 18.1; 4, 9.7 muM at 48 h) obtained for MCF 7 breast cancer cells indicate that they have the potency to kill cancer cells in a time dependent manner, which is similar to cisplatin. The anticancer activity of complexes has been studied by employing various biochemical methods involving different staining agents, AO/EB and Hoechst 33258, which reveal that complexes 1-4 establish a specific mode of cell death in MCF 7 breast cancer cells. The comet assay has been employed to determine the extent of DNA fragmentation in cancer cells. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014.

Note that a catalyst decreases the activation energy for both the forward and the reverse reactions and hence accelerates both the forward and the reverse reactions.Product Details of 37366-09-9, you can also check out more blogs about37366-09-9

Reference:
Highly efficient and robust molecular ruthenium catalysts for water oxidation,
Catalysts | Special Issue : Ruthenium Catalysts – MDPI